Congressional Republicans Kill Bill Fighting Child Marriage

Sad news out of Washington this week on women's rights: The House Republican leadership killed a bill intended to fight child marriage in the developing world, the International Protecting Girls by Preventing Child Marriage Act of 2010. 

The legislation passed the Senate unanimously, where it was cosponsored by Republican Olympia Snowe. In the House, however, just an hour before the vote, the GOP circulated a "whip alert" asking Republicans to vote against the bill. The alert claimed, "There are also concerns that funding will be directed to NGOs that promote and perform abortion and efforts to combat child marriage could be usurped as a way to overturn pro-life laws."

This is hooey. The Helms Amendment–the foreign policy corollary to the noxious Hyde Amendment, which bans federal Medicaid funding of abortion–already bans American foreign aid dollars from funding abortion. Nothing in the child marriage bill would have changed that. 

Sometimes you hear the argument that American feminists spend too much time fighting domestic anti-choice forces and not enough time focusing on the deplorable conditions women and girls live under in the developing world. 

This is a reminder that it's all the same fight, because American conservatives will always use the specter of abortion to kill attempts to empower women and girls, both at home and abroad.

Here's a great video from the UN Foundation's Girl Up project on the "girl effect"–how a girl's life changes if she can continue her education at age 12, instead of entering into a forced marriage.

Click here to learn how to help.

2 thoughts on “Congressional Republicans Kill Bill Fighting Child Marriage

  1. Sarah Boylen

    Abortion and Homosexuals are the magic wands of the Religionist Right. It’s easier to motivate lipservice support when there’s no real skin off the pewsitters’ nose.

    If they were truly sincere, they could attempt to shut down the Country until abortion is halted. It’s not gonna happen, though; religionists get more mileage from identifying “culprits-not-us”.

    Reply
  2. Rusty

    This strikes me as conveniently glib: if the GOP’s opposition to the bill was merely duplicative of the Helms Amendment, why didn’t Dems acquiesce to their demands and pass the thing? More importantly, I don’t doubt that the GOP’s opposition was disingenous (though I’d want to hear what Tom Cockburn was proposing as a compromise first), but to leap from that to the “so when we fight for domestic abortion rights, we’re fighting for women’s international human rights” is way, way too glib.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>