Baltimore Union Rejects Celebrated New Contract: What Does it Mean?

Baltimore Inner Harbor from Federal Hill

On Thursday evening, by a vote of 1,540 to 1,107, the Baltimore Teachers Union rejected the innovative new teacher contract the district and union negotiators agreed to earlier this month. The contract sought to institute teacher merit pay based on performance evaluations, and would allow teachers in individual schools to vote on whether to extend the school day and year. 

Andy Green of the Baltimore Sun provides some good perspective on what is sure to be spun as a major education reform setback; less than half of Baltimore's 6,000 teachers showed up to vote, and a common complaint was that teachers just hadn't been given enough time to truly digest and understand the tenets of the new contract. Another issue is that Baltimore has yet to construct the new evaluation system by which administrators will judge teacher performance. This was also a huge problem during the Rhee negotiations in D.C. It's quite reasonable for workers to feel hesitant about performance pay if they haven't been given a clear, specific idea of how they'll be judged. 

All that said, this vote is a reminder of just how sensitive the tango is between Randi Weingarten, the AFT national president who has embraced the Baltimore contract–calling it "the most professional contract I have seen"–and her members, who are still figuring out exactly how they feel about all the tumult in their profession. The bottom line: This isn't easy. 

After the jump: Baltimore schools CEO Andrés Alonso's quite conciliatory statement on the vote.

Email from Baltimore schools CEO Andrés Alonso, announcing union rejection of new contract:


Dear Friends of City Schools,

This afternoon, by a vote of 1540 to 1107, the proposed contract between City Schools and the Baltimore Teachers Union was not ratified by the membership. There was strong turnout of teachers, reflecting the importance of this contract and the seriousness with which our teachers take their work.

The proposed contract makes a historic shift in how teachers are compensated, in the district’s ability to attract and retain excellent teachers, and in the ability of schools to shape key aspects of school operations. These are essential elements of how we as a district will move forward. Many teachers wanted more information about all the dimensions of the contract and more time to digest what it would mean. I respect the seriousness with which teachers approached the vote and the importance of the questions they have raised.
We are committed to working with teachers until all who voted against the contract understand its benefits or we agree on other conditions that are just as necessary for our schools to move forward as our kids deserve. We look forward to those conversations.
Thank you for all you do for City Schools.
Andrés A. Alonso, Ed.D.
CEO, Baltimore City Public Schools


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>