Women and Health Reform: The Marriage Problem

While men are more likely than women to be uninsured, women’s health coverage is more volatile. Why? Because only 38 percent of women have health coverage through their own job, compared to 50 percent of men. That means women are about twice as likely as men to depend on a spouse or partner’s employer-provided health plan. The negative outcomes here are pretty obvious: For an American woman, the end of a romantic relationship is often not just emotionally tumultuous but medically tumultuous as well, for both herself and her children.

A study in the journal Health Services Research concluded that a husband’s transition from employer-based coverage to Medicare at age 65 can be especially problematic for his younger wife or partner. She must give up her dependent coverage before she herself is eligible for Medicare. Women who experience such disruptions in health care “had a greater probability of experiencing a change in usual clinic/provider (71 percent), delaying filling or taking fewer medications than prescribed because of cost (75 percent), going to the emergency room (52 percent), and had lower average mental health scores than women who did not experience an insurance disruption,” the authors write.

So what does this mean for health reform? The House and Senate bills would represent some progress for dependent women. Instead of being left on the open market if they’re kicked off a partner’s health plan, they could participate in the health insurance exchanges, which are supposed to lower coverage costs through increased competition, including competition with any eventual public health plan. In addition, the expansion of Medicaid coverage to 133 or 150 percent of poverty would cover many more women.

But if the health insurance exchanges end up being weak, and thus bad at bringing down costs, women will remain seriously disadvantaged by a system tethered to employment. To solve the “marriage problem” for women’s health care, the exchanges must be robust, and there must be significant subsidies to help poor and middle-class individuals afford an insurance plan.

cross-posted at TAPPED

3 thoughts on “Women and Health Reform: The Marriage Problem

  1. jonnybutter

    The health care system we have may as well’ve been designed to keep people in check (ie servile). Obedient men (and women) chained to some crap job, some women – let’s face it – obliged to think twice about ending a marriage or relationship, particularly if they have kids or a chronic problem (not the easy dilemma our for-profit moralists blithely claim it to be). It’s really barbaric, and, in the end, intentional. The health care ‘system’ we have is exemplary of the cultural Revolution named’Reagan’: keep people a little intimidated, a little scared.

  2. Hana

    As a woman who gets insurance through her husband, and a woman who has worked with health and age-related issues, I’m so grateful for this post. There are so many ways that women can be left open to, well, ending up screwed. I’m still waiting for someone to offer my mom SSI credits for the time she spent raising two kids while my dad’s job took him out of town for days on end. And is someone going to offer me health insurance for time I spent not working looking after my parents-in-law? No? Huh.

  3. Sungold

    Dana, you do a wonderful job of naming the problem. But the solution can’t be a patchwork like you describe (though that may be all we can hope for, politically, right now). Ultimately health care has to be decoupled from employment status. That’s the only way to ensure full inclusion of women, minorities, the very old, and the very young.

    And of course, the only way to do that – to ensure health care is a human right rather than a perq of employment – is to move toward a single-payer system.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>